The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: Interesting!
In Response To: Interesting! ()

: I like your "no-date" version w/
: "Railmaster" numerals.

Actually I copied the numerals from a Seamaster 30, RAF issue. Probably very similar to the original Railmaster. It annoys me (slightly) that the current SMPs have markers at the 3,6, and 9 positions that are truncated to make space for numerals, but no numerals!

: Did you try a version w/ current large
: number-black bezel?...just curious.

Yes, it looked worse! Those big numbers don't look right with anything IMO. The worst example is the current limited edition "London" Olympic chronometer - they clash horribly with the retro dial design.

Also, the bezel on my 2g SMP (pre-"Bond") is either actually a very dark blue rather than black (like the Seiko Diver watches), or perhaps it has just faded with time.

My overall idea was to get back to the spirit of the Royal Navy issue Seamaster 300s of the 1970s. Hence, no bracelet, no "gimmick" helium valve and no date (only means you have to unscrew the crown to change it every month) - also, as far as I know, the current British Military spec. for diver watches includes the design of the dial and that is based on the old Seamaster 300, not the Rolex Sub / "Bond" style.

Current British issue watches are all Swiss quartz movements, and why not?

I'm sure if I sent a few thousand Euros to Omega they'd be quite happy to do a one-off!

Messages In This Thread

This just in (or not) . . *PIC*
Interesting!
Re: Interesting!
Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE