The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Re: POLL: How many Seamaster Chronograph more...

I have a titanium model (blue dial and bezel) I bought in May 99, and like it very much indeed.

Before I purchased it, I looked into a number of other chronograph models. Since I own another Omega auto, it was the SMC I originally wanted, but changed my mind a number of times.

Other makes I considered were the Ulysse Nardin Marine Chronograph, Hublot Navy Chronograph, IWC Fleigerchronograph, GP Tour de France 250 GT, and Chopard Mille Miglia [I would still love a Breguet Type XX, but can't afford it!]

After many considerations, what turned me back to the Omega was the incredible water resistance without the hassle of screw-down pushers, the C.O.S.C. rating (which I know is much less than its cracked up to be, but if I'm spending the big bucks, better to have it, at least that way Rolex and Tag owners could not get over on me!), and also the fact that it used a polished and hand finished 7750, rather than a timing movement main plate and a chronograph module. This last point I think affects the durability and ease of repair of the OSMPC compared with, say the UN, or the Hublot.

All in all, the watch keeps very good time, and since I wear it all the time, has held up very well so far. I am glad I purchased the titanium model, since the watch IS very large, and the steel version's weight was just too much.

If you enjoy your watch half as much as I enjoy mine, you should be pleased.

Take Care,

Mustafa.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE