The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

why does one HAVE to be better?
In Response To: Omega automatic v. quartz ()

Just like with many things in life, there is more than one way to reach the objective. Sometimes you want the most efficient route to the end point, other times you may prefer to enjoy how you get to your destination--possibly more than the destination itself.

You can choose an automatic or manual transmission for your car, a heat-and-eat prepared meal or homecooked for your dinner, to drive or walk to your destination, to hand write a letter to a friend or type them an email, or to wear a quartz or mechanical watch.

So is any one of these choices always better? No. Each is more suitable for some circumstances than the other. In all these cases, technology has provided "improvements" that are alternatives to the older way of doing things. But none of these improvements are *so* good that they completely replaced the old way.

Sure, there are some things in life that newer technologies did TOTALLY replace. We no longer use carrier pigeons to send messages or start automobiles with a big crank on the front. But most technologies--especially in the field of consumer timekeeping--are no where near as dramatic in the improvements they offer.

Messages In This Thread

Omega automatic v. quartz
Re: Omega automatic v. quartz
why does one HAVE to be better?
Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE