| Informational Websites | ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox | OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website | Zowie -- Omega information |
| Discussion Forums | ChronoMaddox Forum | Heuer Forum | Omega Forum |
| Counterfeit Watchers | ChronoTools Forum | ChronoTrader Forum |
|
|
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
| For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I have the Ti version. Tried on the steel variant a few years ago. It's a big honkin' watch, but not that heavy. As to whether it's the thickest watch, I'm guessing the AP Royal Oak Offshore might be thicker, but not by a whole lot. If you've been wearing, say, a vintage 34-36 mm dress watch, the Seamonster will seem really big, but you'll get used to it right away.
I personally think it's the top sports chronograph on the market, bar none, including the Daytona, Zenith Rainbow series, and, yes, the Speedy Pro (I also have one of them).
If I had to pick one watch to get me through any adventure, the Seamaster Pro Chrono would be it.
Jeff
| Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |