The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

It's alright
In Response To: IWC Question v.02 (sorry) ()

It is easy to be defensive of brands. The worst situations I have seen have come from the Rolex brand and I am glad to see that the brand Omega has not brought about the same level of "defensiveness". I did not feel that you have insulted IWC. It was that your comment was unjustified.

Different brands have different target markets. The lack of innovation in the look of a certain line could be because of the desired target market. However, you could not dispute that the GST line is not innovative. There is a Deep One which has the first mechanical diving gauge. The GST has user-adjustable bracelets,etc.. At the end of the day, people pick what they like.

What I do agree with is that the Seamaster provides excellent value for money and in many ways, this will appeal to more people than the IWC.

Yes, IWC does not discuss accuracy in their brochures. However, eventhough most IWC watches are not certified chronometers, they are adjusted to leave the factory at 0 to +6 seconds (I cannot remember this exactly but am guessing that it is around +5 to +8 seconds per day). Most IWC owners have reported tolerances much less which makes them very accurate watches.

Anyway, it is discussing our ideas on forums that educates us. Please do not feel that this is a bad thing.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE