Re: Omega Seamaster 2221.80 vs. 2220.80
Peter
First let say welcome to the Omega family .... you've made an excellent decision to get an Omega.
Having said that I'm wondering why you feel the need to in at least two postings that I've read by you on this site, you've let it be known that you own a Rolex and a Tag ...... and in this posting you seem compelled to tell us how much you spent on your Omega (really tacky} ...... and you worry about what people will think of you and your purchase.
It's been my experience that many if not most of the Omega owners I've had the good fortune to have met over the years also own other "Luxury" watches such as Rolex, unfortunately Tag can't quite make the leap to the luxury watch category. And when talking about about our watches, we've usually agreed that we weren't real impressed with our Rolex's which is why we switched to Omega and we've never regretted or cared about what others may think of us for having done so ........ why is it so important to you......... and who really gives a damn if the second hand doesn't fall EXACTLY on the hash mark unless you're the timer at some sporting event......I don't look at the second hand long enough to determine EXACTLY where it is ... and I don't know anyone (except you) who does. I think that most of us have more important things to do with our time than obsess over our hash marks .Unfortunately your posting reminds me of the same type of elitist snobbery that seems to afflict folk who try to buy status ....... take some advice....... enjoy your watch .... while you can ..... regardless of the movement ....... cause' you've only got so much .......... time ........left.
Rod ...
longtime Omega owner