The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003. | |||||||
| |||||||
|
See how much better this thread is looking!!
Jeff
++++++++++++++++++++++++
: Jeff,
: I'm guilty of not doing this, the reason being is that I'm not sure
: (as I'm sure many others are) of the etiquette of doing this,
: ie. 'messing up' someones thread title. It also has a greater
: opportunity of veering off the original topic. ie. Someone
: starts a thread called 'Show your Monacos', then someone
: responds with 'Don't have a Monaco, here is my Silverstone',
: next 'Here is my Autavia' etc etc... the thread loses it's
: original purpose.
: There is also confusion as to whether a reply should include the
: original message they are responding to (ie. Your text below my
: text in this reply). As large image or text posts get reproduced
: several times over, or people write a reply that it gets 'lost'
: within the text they are replying to. (I hope that makes sense).
: Recently I posted up pics of my orange diver, then someone else did
: the same thing, but the hands on their orange diver were
: 'incorrect'. Someone then thought it was my watch that had the
: wrong hands, which was an issue, as I was trying to sell it !
: The system works fine, until someone 'does it wrong'!
: Cheers
: Stewart
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |