The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003. | |||||||
| |||||||
|
So unless you can shoot like Bruce, digital is the way to go for watches. It might be satisfying to get that perfect image on a nice old-fashioned piece of film, but I probably have a better chance of winning the lottery (at which time I will hire professionals to photograph and catalog the then vastly-expanded Heuer collection).
Jeff
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Having read all the messages below (about analog and digital, and vinyl and CDs), I will stick with my conclusion: It is almost impossible for any amateur photographer to take consistently good photos of watches, on film. For all the reasons that Jim pointed out in his message, watches are a tough subject and most photographers need the instant feedback of the digital image to see what adjustments are required.
: Sorry this one is a bit late. But I'm still
: analogue for my SLR, so had to dev, scan,
: retouch dust marks, etc etc.
: Realised I couldn't get anywhere near the
: standard of photography by some of the guys
: on this site, so tried something different.
: Not sure it really worked but it's a start.
: ..also realised think I need to buy a macro
: lens and some lights (this one used a slide
: light box for lighting).
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |