The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Well, I tried to approach this w/ as much balance as I could. The "watch is just a watch" and the other, informed, invested remarks you made didn't fit together in my mind - so I really appreciate you putting together this Post to help me get you right.
On its own, I think the questions you raise in this last round are very important. As I've grown in my watch interests, I can now say that I'm primarily interested in "James Bond" associations. Then I work back to the name and the function and the reputation. That said, if Omega advertises -1/+6 precision accuracy, I'm gonna hold them to that, even for a watch that costs half what my Sub retails for - because advertising claims don't just have legal implications, but are part of "the Dell Deaton criteria."
Yeah ... thanks.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |