The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998.
Informational Websites ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website Zowie -- Omega information
Discussion Forums ChronoMaddox Forum Heuer Forum Omega Forum
Counterfeit Watchers ChronoTools Forum ChronoTrader Forum

zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

personally I wouldn't put any weight into any of
In Response To: Re: I love this kind of stuff! ()

it, be it the steel or the supposed "lifespan"....

When the topic of steel arose on another forum someone suggested that vintage watches most likely didn't use 316 grade steel, they indicated that 304 was more likely if not an even lower grade...as little records were probabily kept and there aren't too many metalurgists willing to test their vintage watches and I doubt manufacturers will offer the info I guess alot is speculation...but my point is that many (unfortunately) use the argument that 904 will resist pitting from sweat better than 316 and use vintage pieces as their example...now if the other guy is right then their points are moot...but who knows, show me a SMP or any other modern watch in 30 to 40 years and we will compare :)

As for the aging I personally think that is BS at best, there is nothing about any current Omega or other watch which would indicate it is only a fifteen year watch, I mean really does that mean other ETA based watches such as IWC, UN, Breitling and what not are also fifteen year watches? and since Rolex won't service after thirty years I fail to see how one of their pieces is somehow an eighty year watch, sounds like garbage to me.

Current Position
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE