| Informational Websites | ChronoMaddox -- the legacy of Chuck Maddox | OnTheDash -- vintage Heuer website | Zowie -- Omega information |
| Discussion Forums | ChronoMaddox Forum | Heuer Forum | Omega Forum |
| Counterfeit Watchers | ChronoTools Forum | ChronoTrader Forum |
|
|
The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | |||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
 |
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003. | ||||||
| |||||||
| |||||||
Hi Arno
Thanks for the response i think we need to spend some time one this subject as i think to most this is new info...
As i say my serial is earlier than Tag Heuers museum piece and 21 earlier than Ape (Alex's) and earlier than another one from Jaspers customer mine also has the same case as the Tag Heuer one....so are you saying all 4 of our Chronomatics including the Tag Heuer museum piece are incorrect with certainty...100%?
By the same reasoning does that mean on Monaco Chronomatics 1571xx and 1572xx are correct, if not why?
This is a very important and frankly a really interesting subject, lets spend some time to make sure we all understand what you are saying.
Cheers mate.
Rich
| Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |