zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega.

Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings.

To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

Re: Rolex Vs Omega the eternal question

In Response To: Re: Rolex Vs Omega the eternal question ()

rolex is overrated (i know this from experience) and "irregardless" is not a word (i know this from elementary school).

: Anybody buying a wristwatch for more than a
: couple hundred, or arguably even a hundred
: US dollars can be said to be "showing
: off."

: Especially when a $39.95 Casio will tell time
: just as well if not better. This argument
: about Rolex owners owning their watches to
: "show off" and the same doesn't
: apply to JLC owners, Omega owners, etc is
: hogwash.

: Anybody who knows watches will be impressed by
: an Omega, a Rolex, a JLC, etc. People who
: don't know watches will be impressed by TAG,
: Movado, etc.

: But no one is impressed by a bargain basement
: Casio. Hence my argument that anyone wearing
: an expensive watch irregardless of brand, is
: actually showing off. As is anyone wearing a
: diamond ring......or perfume....or
: cologne....