The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Vintage Heuer Discussion Forum
The place for discussing 1930-1985 Heuer wristwatches, chronographs and dash-mounted timepieces. Online since May 2003. | |||||||
| |||||||
|
I always wondered which party makes a claim against insurance in event of a loss.
I presume it is the seller, as they took out the insurance, the shipping paperwork is in their name.
If this is the case, then surely it is up to the seller to get insurance for themselves. Therefore, a buyer should get a refund if they do not receive an item, whether it is insured or not??
Essentially, isn't the onus to get insurance on the sender / seller??
So, why shouldn't Tom get a refund, he didn't receive something that he paid for? The sender didn't take out insurance, that's their problem?
Am I wrong??
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |