The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
Sorry dear fellow watch lovers to bring the debate once again to the table. But here are a few thoughts I would like to have feedback on.
I am 31 and I have beeen wearing the same SEIKO chronograph for the last 13 years. In terms of value for money, accuracy and durability nothing can beat this watch I believe: I wear it everyday, I sleep with it, I dive with it...In one word it never leaves my wrist.
But recently I felt like something new, like a real watch (i.e a mechanical movement not a quartz). I have done a lot of reasearch with my friends and on the internet. The choices in the end lied between A Jaeger Le Coultre, a Rolex datejust and an Omega Aqua Terra.
Here is why I will NOT buy a rolex.
Rolex are fantastic wacthes nobody can deny this: first wacth to be on top of Everest, ideal as everyday wacth, good consitency of service worlwide, beautiful look and movement, good durability and also good resell value.
BUT I really think that Rolex has fallen victim of its own success. Everybody wants one and it is bought today by a majority of people (not everbody, I do not want to offend anybody here in this forum who is obvioulsy like me a watch nerd and that bought his Rolex for what I would call the good reasons) who simply wants to show their status, that what to show that they have money.
Rolex is not a choice I believe if you like understatement. I do not want to be associated with all of these people that just care about impressing other people. Who wears Rolex today in a lot of cases, not CEOs, not public figures but middle managers, yuppies, chinese business men with a taste for glitter, sales people in need of recognition.
That why I do not feel like putting a Rolex on my wrist that is why I will go for the AT of the JLC master reveil. They are as elegant if not more than the rolex theit mechanical movement is as good but I will not have to live with poeple looking at my wrist thinking: another flash pretentious young guy...
But after all, maybe I am completely wrong... Please let me know what do you think.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |