zOwie Omega Discussion Forum

Opened July 1999, zOwie is the Internet's first and longest running discussion forum dedicated to Omega brand watches.

Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.

For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega.

Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings.

To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately.

Forgot your Password? RSS

Return to Index Read Responses

Re: Rolex Vs Omega the eternal question

In Response To: Re: Rolex Vs Omega the eternal question ()

I agree with you. The only reason I got involved at all was because I was curious. I also mistakenly thought irregardless was not a word and I thought I would add the little extra info on usage.

It wasn't intended as a criticism or a correction of anyone, but merely as as interesting (to me) addendum.

Regards

: Thanks Mark. As this is a casual forum,
: spelling errors are tolerated as well as
: grammatical errors, dbl negatives, etc.

: This is an internet forum. We are not speaking
: (writing) with a strict adherence to the
: "rules" of the King's English
: here. I was able to get my point across in
: that particular post irregardless:>)
: People who read it knew what I meant.

: Stating that "irregardless" was
: "not a word" was merely a poor
: attempt to take away from what I had pointed
: out.

: So I will continue to use the term irregardless
: :>)