The largest independent, non-commercial, consumer-oriented resource on the Internet for owners, collectors and enthusiasts of fine wristwatches. Online since 1998. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
Feel free to discuss pricing and specific dealers. But 'for sale' postings, commercial solicitation and ads are not allowed. Full archive of all messages is accessible through options in the Search and Preferences features. Privacy, policies and administrivia are covered in the Terms of Use.
For the answer to the NUMBER #1 most frequently asked question here--for details or value of a specific older Omega watch you have--go to: Tell Me About My Omega. | Learn more about How To Include Photos and HTML In Your Postings. | To contact someone with a question not relevant to other readers of the forum, please click on their email address and contact them privately. |
I decided on the Seamaster Pro (mid size edition, the full size one was too big for my liking) for several reasons-
-all the peformance of a rolex for half the money. Rolex is good, but certainly not worth double the money. -you are not as much of a target with Omega. With Rolex, people will always comment, 'look at the rolex', with Omega, people instead say, 'look at that nice watch'. There's something pompous about wearing a Rolex that I just don't like. I don't like to wear a watch that is like a big jewel advertising on my wrist (another reason why I opted for the Mid sized Seamaster instead of the large 41mm full size one). I just like a good sturdy attractive watch to wear everyday. -I like the looks of the Seamaster better than the Submariner.
Chronocentric and zOwie site design and contents (c) Copyright 1998-2005, Derek Ziglar; Copyright 2005-2008, Jeffrey M. Stein. All rights reserved. Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the terms of use. | CONTACT | TERMS OF USE | TRANSLATE |